Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Letter to Senator Hatch

1129 E 960 S #23

Provo, UT 84606

April 2, 2012

Senator Hatch

8402 Federal Building

125 South State Street

Salt Lake City, UT 84138

Dear Senator Hatch:

I am writing you to ask for your assistance in making changes to the current laws that exist on the selling of violent video games to minors. Currently there is no age restriction for the purchasing of violent video games and as a result many minors without parental consent can purchase violent video games that are rated M for mature. The playing of these violent video games has been shown in several studies nation-wide to cause increased aggression, desensitization, a lack of empathy and a lack of prosocial behavior. These effects that come from playing violent video games have led to an increase in violent action among those who play them.

Increased aggression, and ultimately an increase in violent activity as a result of playing violent video games is an epidemic that is sweeping the nation. Many minors do not understand the effects of violent video game play, and many parents have a hard time monitoring or screening video games because much of the violence and other lewd behavior that occurs in these games worsens the longer an individual plays and advances in the game. This requires that parents would have to play the video game for hours in order to properly screen for the things their child could be exposed to. Parents also have a hard time monitoring the games their children are playing because their children have easy access to purchase these games without their knowledge.

We currently have a rating system, and laws in place prohibiting minors from viewing rated R films without parental consent. The effects of violent video games have been proved to be as severe as or more severe than that of watching violence in movies. In order to protect our minors from the media they are exposed to certain laws need to be put into place to prohibit the selling of these violent video games to minors. Having laws which prohibit the selling of these games to minors unless given parental permission would limit the exposure of minors to violence and would lower the violent activity that would occur as a result, but would still allow the general public to have the freedom of purchasing such games if they desired. Making such changes and instituting such laws would be in the best interest of the Citizens of Utah as well as the American Public. As the Senator of Utah I am asking you Senator Hatch to consider the facts I have presented to you today and the need for such laws to be put into place. Not making these changes would be irresponsible and would only cause further harm to our community as a whole. A change needs to occur, and only someone in your position can make these changes. Please consider this issue one of upmost importance.

Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,

Alexis Hess

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

I tried...but it really BOMBED


So my husband left to go out of town and I hate having the house absolutely quiet, so while I was eating and pulling out homework (I know its horrible to eat in front of the TV, but I was a cat lady for a night so its okay) I turned on the TV. I was hoping gilmore girls would come on ABC family so I turned it on and the Sweet Life of the American Teenager was on. Not really watching, I decided to leave it because I had never seen the show and heard from other people that it was really good. OH MY GOSH! this show stunk...hard core. It was horrible, the entire show is overly dramatic, is filled with beyond immature teenagers, and all of the characters that are in it sleep around and have no morals. In the one episode I had on the lovely lady up there in the purple with half of herself hanging out slept with 3 guys! yeah lets just say I even watched it longer thinking it would get better, but I was also watching it with a media mind thinking" what is this teaching teens" and then that started becoming interesting....but really bottom line...THIS SHOW IS BEYOND STUPID AND IS IN NO WAY A REAL PICTURE OF REALITY. I WILL NEVER WATCH IT AGAIN.

Friday, March 23, 2012

HUNGER GAMES!-Thoughts?


Okay so like many other people I went to see the midnight showing. I caved to the pressure of extended family members to go at midnight instead of at a normal time of day and it was a ton of fun. Even though I was being slightly irresponsible since I have had classes and work all day it was well worth the quality time spent with family (yes, that is my justification :) ) I really liked the show and I thought a lot of it was well done. I appreciated the fact that it was not as gruesome as they could have made it. (they hid a lot of the really violent scenes from the book by different camera angles, that way you know what happened without actually seeing blood and guts.) The two characters that surprised me the most that I really ended up loving who they picked to play them were Cinna and Haymitch. They were awesome. The film was not exactly how I imagined it though. Don't get me wrong it was good, but I didn't get the same wahoo that I did when reading it or after walking out of some other movies, I'm wondering if my expectations were too high-maybe I was way too tired, but I don't know.... What did you think of the show? Give me your opinions!

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Presidential Candidates

Another week of busy school classes and projects means no TV time, and aside from the normal classical music I have been listening to while doing my homework, I feel like I have been living in a whole when I get home. It goes something like this: Get home, eat something, wash dishes, go upstairs, sit at desk, do homework till 2:00, brush teeth, go to bed. But the media this week I have actually chosen to be exposed to is the presidential debates. I feel it is important to keep informed and up to date so that I can actually be an informed voter when the time comes. I check different news cites and the headline for today is below, but it made me think with all the media we are exposed to is everyone using it to learn and be informed? Get info on the candidates if you can :D

Romney Rolls to Illinois Win

Victory in Another Midwest State Builds GOP Delegate Lead

WSJ's Neil King looks at Mitt Romney's strong showing in the Illinois presidential primary and how the victory improves his chances of securing the nomination. Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Mitt Romney racked up a decisive victory Tuesday in the Illinois primary, shoring up his claim that he will inevitably take the Republican presidential nomination and dealing another blow to Rick Santorum's bid to block him.

With 99% of precincts reporting, Mr. Romney led with 47% to Mr. Santorum's 35%. Rep. Ron Paul of Texas had 9%, and Newt Gingrich trailed with 8%.

That gave Mr. Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, fresh momentum heading into a month in which the race moves largely to Northeast and mid-Atlantic states that are friendly terrain for him.

While the nominating contest has remained competitive longer than he expected, Mr. Romney has won in every region of the country but the Deep South, including in Ohio, Florida and Virginia—large states that will be battlegrounds when the Republican winner faces Democratic President Barack Obama this fall. The Illinois victory gives him a trifecta in the industrial Midwest, following much narrower wins in Michigan and Ohio.

GOP candidate Mitt Romney scored a decisive win in Tuesday's primary election. In his victory speech, he slammed President Obama on jobs creation and touted his own success as a businessman. WSJ's Sara Murray reports.

REUTERS

Mitt and Ann Romney on Tuesday.

The Illinois primary gave Mr. Santorum his best shot yet at a head-to-head matchup with Mr. Romney, as Messrs. Gingrich and Paul made little effort to campaign in the state. But Mr. Santorum didn't seem to benefit from the waning of support for Mr. Gingrich, raising questions about whether Mr. Romney's rivals together can achieve their goal of preventing him from winning the nomination.

"With each step after Illinois, it becomes tougher for the remaining three others in the field to raise money and make a compelling case," said Rich Bond, a former chairman of the Republican National Committee.

Mr. Romney hailed the results Tuesday night as an "extraordinary victory" before turning his attention to Mr. Obama, saying the president's background before running for office gave him little understanding of how to shepherd the economy.

Delegate Tracker

Follow the results of the primaries and caucuses.

[0312Elexpromo]

On the Issues

Read where each Republican hopeful stands on major issues.

Poll Tracker

WSJ's guide to the latest political polls

[polls_promo]

"You can't learn that teaching constitutional law. You can't learn that as a community organizer,'' Mr. Romney said at a victory party in the Chicago suburb of Schaumburg.

"I'm running for president because I have the experience and the vision to get us out of this mess," he said.

Mr. Santorum answered on Tuesday night by challenging Mr. Romney's background as an investor and management consultant.

"We don't need a manager," the former senator told supporters in his home state of Pennsylvania. "We need someone who is going to pull up government by the roots and throw it out and do something to liberate the private sector in America."

Mr. Gingrich's poor showing will intensify pressure on him to drop out of the race. But his statement Tuesday night was combative.

"To defeat Barack Obama, Republicans can't nominate a candidate who relies on outspending his opponents" by large margins, Mr. Gingrich said. "Instead, we need a nominee who offers powerful solutions.''

The Illinois primary will expand Mr. Romney's delegate lead substantially—even more than the popular-vote spread would indicate, under the state's system for awarding delegates. Election returns showed Mr. Romney picking up at least 43 delegates to 10 for Mr. Santorum, with one delegate not yet determined.

But the results still didn't seal the deal for Mr. Romney. While it will boost his lead in the delegate chase, it will take strong performances in contests over the next month for Mr. Romney to claim the 1,144 delegates needed to clinch the nomination, and probably longer than that.

Patrick Brady, Illinois RNC Chair, joins the News Hub to discuss Illinois's profile in the presidential campaign. Photo: AFP / Getty Images.

The next state to vote, Louisiana, is considered likely to support Mr. Santorum in balloting Saturday, because of the predominance of evangelical and conservative voters who have been cool to Mr. Romney.

In Illinois, Mr. Romney carried the same groups of voters that he has in most other states—more-affluent, suburban and centrist voters.

Although that wasn't enough to win in the South, it proved to be a powerful coalition in a big, industrial state where evangelicals and very conservative voters hold less sway.

According to exit polls released by media outlets, Illinois Republicans were most concerned about choosing a candidate who could beat Mr. Obama. Among that group, Mr. Romney was the overwhelming favorite, winning 71% support.

Surveys of voters as they left the state's polling places also showed Mr. Romney losing to Mr. Santorum among lower-income and rural voters, and among people who called themselves "very conservative,'' consistent with voting trends in many earlier contests.

After unexpected first-place finishes by Mr. Santorum in Alabama and Mississippi last week, a win by him in Illinois would have further upended the race and damaged Mr. Romney's standing.

Mr. Romney's delegate haul from the Illinois contest remains unclear, but it is sure to be large. Delegates are not awarded according to the results of the popular vote, but are directly elected by voters.

At stake Tuesday were 54 of the state's 69 convention delegates—the rest to be assigned at a state convention in June. Mr. Santorum forfeited the right to compete for 10 of the delegates, because he failed to qualify for the ballot in four congressional districts.

Illinois held great promise for Mr. Romney because of its concentration of voters who tend to favor him—those who are affluent and less-ideologically driven—especially in the populous Chicago suburbs.

According to exit polls, 71% of the votes cast in Tuesday were in the state's suburbs.

Centrist Republicans dominated Illinois for decades, electing GOP governors who supported a woman's right to an abortion. During that stretch, the state proved hospitable to business-friendly Republicans in Mr. Romney's mold.

Conservative activists have gained influence since the GOP lost its grip on the governorship in 2003, a trend that forced Mr. Romney to work hard for votes and outspend his rivals on television.

WSJ's Neil King previews Tuesday's Illinois primary and how the upcoming dates on the GOP primary calendar might benefit the candidates. Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images

The long-simmering divide between the state's powerful Republican establishment and its aggrieved conservative base played prominently down the stretch.

Mr. Romney touted a long list of endorsements from elected officials as he toured the state, while Mr. Santorum tried to tap conservative discontent by presenting himself as the protest candidate for activists looking to shake things up.

Neither candidate mounted an aggressive turnout effort in the state, as both have been hopscotching from one state to the next in what has become a grinding primary fight.

Mr. Romney and his allies were able to maintain a sizable advantage in television advertising.

The Romney campaign and Restore Our Future, a super PAC that is supporting his bid, combined to spend more than $3.5 million in Illinois, according to figures provided by multiple media buyers tracking those reservations.

By contrast, the Santorum campaign and his super PAC, The Red, White and Blue Fund, combined to spend roughly $525,000.

That edge was more pronounced in the Chicago area. Mr. Romney and his super PAC spent more than $1.6 million on broadcast TV ads in the state's most influential media market.

The Santorum campaign's only presence on Chicago TV came from a comparatively small $138,000 statewide cable buy.

Mr. Romney appealed to some voters because of his emphasis on economic issues.

"I think he can take care of the economy,'' said Jan Dunteman, 74 years old, a lifelong Republican who voted for Mr. Romney in the Chicago suburb of Addison.

Others seemed resigned to Mr. Romney as the inevitable nominee. "He's the last man standing,'' said Nicholas Dell, 73, as he left Dapper's Restaurant in Addison wearing a sticker indicating he had voted.

Mr. Santorum continued to draw support from Republicans who view him as more consistently conservative than Mr. Romney, particularly on divisive social issues.

"He's more conservative," said Dan Romano, 55, a salesman who prefers Mr. Santorum's stance on social issues.

"His values mirror my own," said Kathleen Fang, 60, who cast a ballot for Mr. Santorum at a polling site in Addison.

The election Tuesday gave voters in Mr. Obama's backyard a chance to appraise his tenure in office ahead of the general election in November. In some cases, the news may prove unwelcome for the White House.

Democrats James and Margaret Haubner, both 71, cast ballots for Mr. Romney on Tuesday after voting for Mr. Obama in 2008. They said they had grown frustrated with the president, citing his recent fight with the Catholic Church over contraception and the scandal involving a failed solar-panel manufacturer that cost the federal government more than $500 million in guaranteed loans.

Mr. Romney would "do better than what we have in there now," Mrs. Haubner said outside a polling site in Addison. Her husband added, "He's got to go."

—Siobhan Hughes contributed to this article.